Marcia G. Yerman

Connect With Me

Twitter Facebook FriendFeed
LinkedIn Google+ TimesPeople

Sexual Assault and Undocumented Women in Trumpland

Sexual Assault and Undocumented Women in Trumpland

Since Trump took office, there is increased concern for a demographic facing sexual assault: undocumented women.

June 4, 2017 | No comment | Read More »

“Climate of Hope” Offers Cities, Businesses and Citizens as Drivers of Climate Action

“Climate of Hope” Offers Cities, Businesses and Citizens as Drivers of Climate Action

Pope and Bloomberg agree that the impetus for change is not going to come from Washington. They see cities as the drivers of change and the “key” to tackling the problems of climate change.

May 18, 2017 | No comment | Read More »

Post-Election: New Women in Congress Inspire Hope

Post-Election: New Women in Congress Inspire Hope

On Election Day, I cast my vote full of hope.

On Wednesday morning, I went to bed at 3 a.m. — after watching eight hours of election returns. When I woke up, I had a severe case of dread. Not an existential dread. Rather, a version that I could feel in every fiber of my body.

I have been writing about the environment for six years.

As I looked over all the articles I have produced,

November 17, 2016 | No comment | Read More »

Trump Gets Challenged on Climate Change Censorship

Trump Gets Challenged on Climate Change Censorship

“The Trump administration can deny the reality of the climate crisis, but it can’t make it go away by simply telling government employees not to mention it anymore. This kind of anti-science meddling leads us straight back to the dark ages.”

July 12, 2017 | No comment | Read More »


Trump Gets Challenged on Climate Change Censorship

President Trump’s tweets get plenty of coverage. Yet, there are currently numerous actions by his administration that are designed to restrict the free flow of information from federal agencies. This is particularly significant in the fight against climate change. A combination of disinformation, suppression of facts that should be in the public domain, and the erasure of elements from federal websites are concerning from agencies set up to protect Americans.

In an effort to learn if staff members were told not to use established scientific language via a “gag order,” the Center for Biological Diversity filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. They directed their inquiries to the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of the Interior, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the Department of Energy. The purpose was to get documentation of directives on the type of verbiage workers could or could not use.

Staff was allegedly instructed to either “remove” or “not use” any vocabulary that related to climate change. Examples include, but are not limited to, “greenhouse gas emissions,” “global warming,” “climate disruption,” and “global warming.” Ironically, “Paris agreement” was also in the mix.

The agencies were also asked to report if they had destroyed any records.

Almost two months later on May 30, the Center sued the Trump administration in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. The reason? There had been no response, thereby “violating deadlines established under the law.”

The first point in the legal papers states:

“The Center for Biological Diversity (“Center”) — An environmental conservation organization that works to protect native wildlife species and their habitats — challenges the failure of the U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Department of Energy, and U.S. Department of State to provide records concerning the Trump administration’s censorship of these federal departments’ and their component agencies’ discussion or dissemination about climate change, in violation of the Freedom of Information Act.”

I spoke with Taylor McKinnon, Public Lands Campaigner at the Center. He reiterated reports of EPA workforce harassment, and accounts of web pages taken down. It was apparent that staff and scientists were being intimidated.

“My response,” McKinnon said, “was we need to pry the hood off of this.” A key goal was to establish where the instructions were coming from.

Some records were delivered to the Center. However, for the bulk of what the Center was seeking – they were “stonewalled.” This is what prompted the lawsuit.

“We’re not going to allow the administration to drag its feet,” McKinnon emphasized. “We’re going to hold them to the letter of the law.”

With the belief that what was taking place needed to be “exposed,” McKinnon stated, “We think the information will say volumes.”

The conversation shifted to the EPA under the direction of Scott Pruitt. McKinnon expressed his concern over “fossil fuel corruption.” He underscored, “Pruitt is a catastrophe for America.”

The Center is also pushing back to save data. Along with conservation biologist Stuart Pimm and the Center for Media and Democracy, they have combined forces to save scores of environmental “data sets” on government websites, from removal by the administration.

Back in March, McKinnon released a statement that encapsulates the situation at hand:

“This is like telling government scientists not to mention gravity or the fact that the Earth revolves around the sun. The Trump administration can deny the reality of the climate crisis, but it can’t make it go away by simply telling government employees not to mention it anymore. This kind of anti-science meddling leads us straight back to the dark ages.”

Suppressing information, employee gag orders and perpetuating disinformation is a form of political pressure that adds to the weakening of the federal agencies we depend on to protect our families. We deserve better from our elected officials.

Tell Your Elected Representatives to Say No to Trump’s Plans to Slash the EPA Budget

This article originally appeared on the website Moms Clean Air Force.

Share |

Jul 12, 2017 | No comment | Read More »

Sexual Assault and Undocumented Women in Trumpland

The days of having an advocate like Vice President Joe Biden, who introduced the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) in 1990, are over.

Since Trump took office, there is increased concern for a demographic facing sexual assault: undocumented women.

Fear of deportation and newly implemented Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) policies and protocol have exacerbated existing problems for this population. A woman could be here for two months or twenty years. It is now far more likely that if she is in a situation of domestic violence, sexual abuse, or has been raped — she will not seek help from police or social safety nets.

In April, the National Taskforce to End Sexual and Domestic Violence (NTF) an umbrella organization comprised of a wide range of groups “committed to securing an end to violence against women,” sent a letter to John F. Kelly, the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. They requested that the DHS “recognize that immigrant survivors deserve access to safety and justice.” They requested that DHS meet with stakeholder organizations “to discuss ways to ensure that ICE policies and procedures do not deter survivors of domestic and sexual violence from accessing critical protections.”

Previously, Kelly had stated that his department would, “Apprehend immigrant victims of crime at courthouses.”

That assertion is in conflict with special considerations that were set up to give immigrant victims of domestic violence protection under the VAWA and the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPA).

To make matters worse, there is ongoing confusion among ICE agents, victims, and support organizations on what the current ICE protocols actually are.

Example: A woman has lived in the United States for ten years. Her partner is documented, and her children are American-born. If she considers seeking services or pressing charges, her abuser can use the threat of deportation as a tactic to keep her compliant. In addition, he can intimidate her with the potential loss of her children’s custody.

Meanwhile, the offender sees no consequences for his behavior, and is likely to repeat violent crimes against others.

In Houston and Los Angeles, there has been a drop in the number of rapes reported to the police by Hispanic women. Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck recounted in a news release that rape stats had dropped by 25 percent, and domestic violence stats were down by 10 percent. Beck pointed out, “The Department believes deportation fears may be preventing Hispanic members of the community from reporting when they are victimized.”

I reached out to Grace Huang, the Policy Director at the Asian Pacific Institute on Gender-Based Violence.

Huang worked as an immigration lawyer. Through her experiences, she witnessed clients struggling to get their papers — while trying to extricate themselves from abusive relationships. She connected the dots.

Via email Huang wrote:

“The fear of deportation is one of the primary barriers preventing immigrant survivors from seeking help. Perpetrators often exploit this fear as a tool of control to keep victims silent. Recent DHS enforcement activities and statements that victims and witnesses are not exempt from enforcement bolsters abusers’ threats. This undermines safety not only for immigrant victims, but also for our entire community.”

The Tahirih Justice Center works specifically to “protect immigrant women and girls in the United States.” Beyond offering legal and social services, they understand that policy and litigation is key to promoting legislation that will codify protections for immigrant girls and women. They have offices in the San Francisco Bay area, Houston, Greater D.C., and Baltimore, and can give referrals for help in other locations.

Moving forward, there must be vocal outrage and support for those women who are blocked from legal remedies due to fear of detainment and deportation.

These women are the most vulnerable among us.

The choice cannot be between arrest or abuse. Suffering violence is not an option.

Share |

Jun 4, 2017 | No comment | Read More »

State Senator Jeff Klein: Hero or Goat?

The weather forecast was for a very hot day — ninety degrees. Regardless, I wanted to witness an on the ground action by Rise and Resist, a group active in response to the election of Donald Trump. (Full disclosure: I am a member of a New York Indivisible group.)

While the rest of the country is dealing with the daily breaking news of “Trumpland,” New York State has its own political drama which is picking up steam.

It’s all about Albany politics, specifically the State Senate. Eight elected Democrats have joined a group called the Independent Democratic Conference (IDC). Under the tutelage of State Senator Jeffrey Klein, they have formed a coalition with Republicans.

With the arrival of Trump’s agenda, voters are getting more tuned in to government at every level. The IDC, previously under the radar, now finds itself scrutinized, both by a newly energized electorate and New York newspapers.

The location of the protest was listed as being at Klein’s Bronx office, 1250 Waters Place, located in the Hutchinson Metro Center. Rather, it was on a two-way street at the foot of the entrance to the large, gated complex.

I didn’t see demonstrators when I arrived, and wondered if I were in the right place. The first thing I saw suggesting I was in the correct vicinity was a large truck. It sported the message, “Laborers Support New York State Senator JEFFREY KLEIN.” In small print was the acknowledgement, “Paid for by New York State Laborers PAC.”

I finally spotted a gaggle of people. They were behind a barricade that had a blue banner with a photograph of Klein. Many of the men had signs or shirts identifying them as belonging to the Transport Workers Union Local 100.

I engaged in conversation with a woman giving directives. She was from Klein’s office, but declined to give me her name. She informed me the people in attendance were part of a community rally, because Klein supports efforts to fix the Tier 6 Bill. “John Samuelson [TWU Local 100 President] supports the IDC,” she said. “Labor issues, working people, retirement — are all one and the same.” When I pressed her on whether the IDC had been preventing legislation that would help most average New Yorkers she replied, “It’s news to me.”

Bronx Community Board 11 member, Marcy Gross, was anxious to share her enthusiasm for Klein. “He supports progressive issues as well as old-school issues,” Gross told me emphatically. “He supports unions.” Without missing a beat, she suggested, “He should run for President!”

I was given a flyer, a list of suggested chants. “Jeff Klein is on our side,” and “The IDC fights for me,” seemed to be favorites. A man yelled out, “There’s nobody more honest than Jeff Klein.”

Further down the sidewalk, a lone anti-Klein activist holding a sign debated with two Klein supporters. The conversation was getting heated. Eventually, the anti-Klein advocate walked away, realizing she wasn’t getting any traction.

I took the opportunity to jump in and ask about their support of Klein. The man, still agitated from the encounter, said, “Klein has given every school in the district $16,500. Nobody cares about the people! They care more about party than people. Klein has found a way to get things done.” He identified himself as a resident of Morris Park before stating, “I think the IDC is great.” I inquired, “May I ask who you voted for in the Presidential election?” His answer was succinct. “No comment.”

At this point, the Rise and Resist contingent had assembled on the opposite side of the street. At the crosswalk, I met a man with a New York State Police Correction Officers’ Benevolent Association shirt. I asked him about his views.

“Klein has supported us on our issues,” he said. “The IDC did an independent review on assaults on our staff. They gave the proper information.” He then referenced media distortions circulated based on “lower numbers reported by the agency.” He paused and underscored, “The IDC brings stability to the State Senate. I can only go with what Klein has done for our profession.”

I crossed the street and waded into the anti-Klein demonstrators. Their signs also encapsulated a clear point of view: IDC=GOP, Fake Dems, and Indecent/Deceitful/Collaborators. They served to nail down objections to the eight “rogue” Democrats in the IDC conference.

An article had already appeared in the New York Times, outlining questions swirling around IDC members who had received monies in the form of stipends. (Days later, a piece in the New York Post dug further in the matter of leadership “lulus.”)

I spoke first to Eve Proper of Rise and Resist, who explained the group was doing a series of protests against the IDC. “These are Democrats who do not caucus with Democrats. They give Republicans a Senate majority, so that Republicans can stop bills in committee.” Jamie Bauer, standing nearby, was quick to mention the “lulus” situation.

Most of the people I interviewed had specific concerns. One woman gave me a primer on the 1971 Urstadt Law, which allows the state to have the last word on New York City rent-regulated housing. She pointed out that Klein had major donors in the real estate industry, and hasn’t been anxious to see the legislation overturned.

Aggie Mullaney, who called herself a “community activist and a mother” said, “Single payer is a perfect example. It gets through the Assembly but doesn’t pass the Senate. The IDC is enabling a Trump agenda.” Mullaney was concerned with expanding voting rights and the DREAM Act. “We explain to voters that members of the IDC, who they voted for as Democrats, are working with Republicans. Most of them have no idea what the IDC is. It’s a subterfuge!”

My conversations were interrupted by car horns honking in support of the Klein advocates. The Klein truck made several passes down the street during the time I was there.

I heard rumblings that the “counter-demonstration” was peopled by folks brought on-site. I contacted Rise and Resist point person, Paul Rabin, on Monday to check on that story. Rabin confirmed, “There were two or three school buses that people were getting on to. I spoke to several women there. They didn’t seem to know what the IDC was.”

Educational consultant Toby Marxuach-Gusciora related, “I think Klein does what’s good for Republicans, and they believe in charter schools. These schools pick the top kids, and then the public schools don’t have diverse populations. It’s killing education for minorities, and in the long run — public education.”

Maria Bautista, NYC Campaigns Director of the Alliance for Quality Education, was also concerned about the IDC role in the public education space. “As part of their coalition with the Republicans in the Senate, Klein and the IDC voted to underfund public schools, and to fund privately run charter schools instead. Our public schools in New York City are owed $1.9 billion as a result of the Campaign for Fiscal Equity lawsuit. The Senate Republicans are fighting tooth and nail against this money for our children. Yet, Jeff Klein and his IDC colleagues are empowering the Senate Republicans instead of fighting for our schools.” I asked Bautista about the pro-Klein people stating that Klein was bringing funds into the schools. She told me she had spoken to some Klein supporters about the work the Alliance was doing. “Jeff Klein apparently secures additional funding for the schools in his district. Community members were very aware of this. However, the reality is that this money is a fraction of what is owed. His district alone was owed $102 million this past year and he’s blocked his community and the state from benefiting from the full funding for public schools.” Reflecting on how Klein was massaging his district she suggested, “It seems he takes care of local schools and awards grants to curry favor.”

I got quite similar feedback on the “follow the money” component from Darius Longarino. A young lawyer, Longarino called Klein’s offices in Albany and the Bronx to express the need for early voting and automatic registration. “The GOP provides Senator Klein with several tens of million dollars for projects in his district,” he said.

“This is far more than any other senator — Republican or Democrat — many of them representing districts more in need of financial support. Why does this happen? The GOP is buying Klein’s loyalty, and Klein, in turn, buys loyalty in the district. Klein is often pictured in the paper giving out big checks to parks and local groups, but the cost of his backroom bargain with the GOP is invisible. For example, our district’s public schools are owed $80 million in Foundation Aid, the distribution of which the IDC and GOP have endeavored to slow and diminish. Meanwhile, they have passed legislation to prop up the charter school industry.”

Longarino pointed me to a 2015 PoliticoNewYork drill-down on Klein and his $11 million plus in earmarks. “It’s about money in return for support,” Longarino concluded. “He buys the peace while preventing progressive action.”

Photos: Bob Volin


Share |

May 25, 2017 | No comment | Read More »

Bill de Blasio Holds Town Hall in Northwest Bronx

A diverse group of constituents from the Northwest Bronx met with Mayor Bill de Blasio...

Feb 23, 2017 | No comment | Read More »

Local Activism Pays Off

Individuals from all walks of life, who are concerned about the future of their children...

Dec 18, 2014 | No comment | Read More »

The Military Battles Climate Change

Ret. Adm. David Titley said,"The ocean, atmosphere and ice do not caucus, do not vote,...

Jul 27, 2014 | 1 comment | Read More »

EPA Adminstrator McCarthy Makes A “Moral Obligation To The Next Generation”

McCarthy, who doesn’t pull any punches, stated, “Climate change caused by carbon pollution is one...

Oct 11, 2013 | No comment | Read More »

IPCC Report: Man-Made Climate Change Is A Scientific Certainty

The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released its new report on September...

Oct 2, 2013 | No comment | Read More »

Small Businesses Support President Obama’s Climate Plan

After extreme weather incidents like Hurricane Sandy, 40 percent of small businesses do not reopen....

Jul 23, 2013 | No comment | Read More »